tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-357083302011-04-21T18:51:04.261-07:00Steve Parkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06263067617393619984noreply@blogger.comBlogger101100tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35708330.post-1166751370509732582006-12-21T17:35:00.000-08:002006-12-21T17:36:10.596-08:00

Hello, this was my final project for one of my master's classes that I just finished. I had fun making it - my first time making a video (so it's pretty basic). Hope you enjoy.-George-

Steve Parkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06263067617393619984noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35708330.post-1164773997463012132006-11-28T18:35:00.000-08:002006-11-28T20:19:57.903-08:00

BLOG #1Finally, a topic in which I can relate to through personal experience and not just pretend I know what I'm talking about. My wife and I were just married a short time ago, so there have been some adjustments from single life to married life. We both carried cell phones, but on different carriers. Her contract was up at the end of October and I had already been month to month for

Steve Parkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06263067617393619984noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35708330.post-1164038111449495052006-11-20T07:15:00.001-08:002006-11-20T07:55:11.476-08:00

A provocative undertaking of journalism history in a short 22 page account is my reaction to Gillmor. It was a mass reality check of the evolution over time of the effects of freedom of press. It's true that we take it for granted in the United States, although, I don't think the issue as to whether or not we actually do have freedom of press is really resolved by some. I don't care to address

Steve Parkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06263067617393619984noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35708330.post-1164038057234611432006-11-20T07:15:00.000-08:002006-11-20T07:54:17.270-08:00

A provocative undertaking of journalism history in a short 22 page account is my reaction to Gillmor. It was a mass reality check of the evolution over time of the effects of freedom of press. It's true that we take it for granted in the United States, although, I don't think the issue as to whether or not we actually do have freedom of press is really resolved by some. I don't care to address

Steve Parkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06263067617393619984noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35708330.post-1163403755166790482006-11-12T22:11:00.000-08:002006-11-12T23:42:35.950-08:00

Was anyone else surprised by this article? I'm not oblivious to the diversity of opinion on population, nor do I think Hardin is totally off-based, but couldn't he have left a little room for religious ideology as a possible exception to the rule. His "Puritan inheritance," as he states, is almost used as a derogative. My religious background commends Hardin’s uses of mutual coercion,

Steve Parkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06263067617393619984noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35708330.post-1162826386119464462006-11-06T07:19:00.000-08:002006-11-06T07:19:46.126-08:00

Steve Parkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06263067617393619984noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35708330.post-1162320280648860382006-10-31T10:43:00.000-08:002006-10-31T10:44:40.656-08:00

I’m not sure what to think of Friedman’s metaphorical usage of breaking down the wall. It seems pretty obvious to me that by breaking down barriers, in this case of open source information, we relinquish power to express ideas freely, communicate more fluidly, and innovate for the future. Unless we’re talking about the implications on social sciences, then all I can say to Friedman is “duh!”

Steve Parkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06263067617393619984noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35708330.post-1161615981767362492006-10-23T07:42:00.000-07:002006-10-24T19:07:39.073-07:00

It's irrevocablely true that to forecast the future to an exact degree is whole heartedly too difficult to do. Speculation; however, on the possibilities of an upcoming future from an ever changing present remain to be conditioned on solid facts. Solid facts are all we have to go on. Speculation is premissable, but better determined with what we already have. Bush's stimulating look into the

Steve Parkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06263067617393619984noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35708330.post-1161010136375086262006-10-16T06:51:00.000-07:002006-10-16T07:48:56.403-07:00

It is not farfetched to say that people are easily awed by innovation, specifically technological ones. How many of you have been hooked by the functionality of a new cell phone or the high definition of a television set? Did you ever think to yourself "I wish I had that or I'm going to buy that?" The text book incorporates the notion of "supervening necessity." As did better business

Steve Parkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06263067617393619984noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35708330.post-1160339823675142192006-10-08T13:36:00.000-07:002006-10-09T02:40:06.516-07:00

Indulge me for a second and look with me at the way new technologies introduce themselves. I must admit this may come to some of you as little on the dystopian side of things, but I honestly don't intend it that way. But back to my point...doesn't it seem with every new innovation of technology a bigger and better one will soon follow? I know, I'm so profound. Trust me that I have a much more

Steve Parkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06263067617393619984noreply@blogger.com1